By Dr. Peter S. Ruckman
In an try to hijack the readership of the unique Scofield Reference Bible which retained the textual content of the licensed model, the editors of the hot Scofield Reference Bible replaced the textual content in their paintings in whatever like 500 areas whereas claiming to submit the approved model; that's, they lied! simply because the “New” King James model smuggled the readings of the Revised normal model into the King James textual content, the recent Scofield Reference Bible smuggled the readings of the defunked American common model into the textual content of the licensed model. during this paintings, Dr. Ruckman exhibits you the place the editors of the NSRB lied approximately their textual content. And even if Oxford Press now publishes an variation of the NSRB with the particular KJV textual content, they nonetheless print the altered textual content correct besides the hot version, so the fabric during this paintings is proper because it was once whilst it used to be first released.
Read or Download About the New Scofield Reference Bible PDF
Similar criticism & interpretation books
Paperback variation is out there from the Society of Biblical Literature (www. sbl-site. org)
Departing from scholarship devoted to the socio-historical realities of priesthood at Qumran, this publication explores photos of otherworldly and messianic/eschatological priesthood within the lifeless Sea Scrolls as a mirrored image of the non secular worldview of the Qum
This publication investigates the nature of the "Peshitta" in "Psalms 90-150" with a view to facilitate the correct use of this model in textual feedback. It identifies the Peshitta's translation options and it discusses the version's interpretation of inauspicious passages within the Hebrew textual content. The query of the Hebrew Vorlage at the back of the "Peshitta Psalter" is raised.
The Bible and Christian culture have, at top, provided an ambiguous observe in keeping with Earth's environmental problems. At worst, a posh, frequently one-sided heritage of interpretation has left the Bible's voice silent. Aiming to bridge those gaps, Richard Bauckham mines scripture and theology, gaining knowledge of a company command for Christians to deal with all of God's construction after which discusses the generations of theologians who've sought to reside out this biblical mandate.
Extra info for About the New Scofield Reference Bible
Well, the Board of Editors call it a King James Version. Do you know what's the matter with them? They either need their heads looked at or their hearts looked at. And I prefer to say heads to give them the benefit of a doubt. A man has to be ignorant or crooked to pawn that kind of thing off on anyone. I prefer not to accuse the brethren and judge them. I just say they are ignorant. But you people who have heard what I had to say tonight, you haven't got any alibi left. Do you know that? You ought to wear a dunce cap if you fool with a Bible like that.
Look at the alteration of verse 29 in the NSRB. That's no help! That is a verse teaching hyperCalvinism when it says God's purpose and not His "foreknowledge" is first. It isn't anything of the kind. This is trying to say purpose precedes foreknowledge. Peter says in 1 Peter that foreknowledge precedes election. Somebody is trying to put Machen, Warfield, and A. T. Robertson back into the Bible with Kuyper, Dabney, and Hodge. " "They" couldn't refer to the "CREATION" because the "CREATION" is singular and the "THEY" is plural.
Wrong lead. Perhaps the most corrupt of the many corrupt verses in the NSRB was the half-way movement toward the Revised Standard Version in Romans where there is a very vivid verse aimed at people who mess with the word of God. When the RSV translators hit the verse, it shook them up as much as it did the Scofield editors. C. I. " But of course, that isn't what the King James text says at all. " They "CHANGED" it. They were "CHANGE" agents. "EXCHANGE" is not the word. They "CHANGED" it. " Well, it came from the ASV (1901) that went bankrupt because it couldn't sell, since it wasn't worth the crap it was made out of.
About the New Scofield Reference Bible by Dr. Peter S. Ruckman